Tree Crickets

August 23rd, 2009 by John Callender

I’ve heard male crickets singing at night since I was a young boy, but I’ve never seen one singing. A few weeks ago Linda and I started hearing one in the backyard, and one evening I was interested enough to head out with a flashlight. I didn’t expect I’d actually be able to find the cricket; I’d always believed (without ever testing it) that crickets are natural ventriloquists, very hard to locate by ear, and that the insect would stop singing as I approached.

But no, it turns out this cricket was quite happy to let me locate and sneak up on him, and continued singing even as I got close enough (too close, it turns out) to snap this photo:

cricket1s

I say “too close” because the image is a little out of focus, something I didn’t notice until I got inside and uploaded the image to my computer. But by then I couldn’t go back and try for a better-focused shot, because while taking the above image I accidentally jostled a branch, causing him to stop singing and lower his wings (which are in their raised, singing position in that shot above). Here’s an even-fuzzier shot I got after he lowered his wings:

cricket2s

I got in trouble with Linda for making the cricket stop singing, and she forbade me to bother it any more; she’s still mad about it two weeks later. So that’s the best I can do, image-wise.

It turns out, though, that there’s lots of information about tree crickets (which is what this guy was) online; so I’ve since learned that this was probably either a snowy tree cricket (Oecanthus fultoni), which is found all through the lower 48 states, or a Riley’s tree cricket (O. rileyi), found only in the western states.

To tell the difference, I could have examined the little black markings in the first two segments at the base of the insect’s antennae. Or I could have carefully measured the temperature, and the rate at which the insect was chirping; Riley’s chirps are somewhat slower for a given temperature, while snowy chirps are somewhat faster. Snowy chirps also are faster in western populations than eastern ones, possibly because that helps the insects distinguish themselves from Riley’s.

I love the Internet.

Lots more about tree crickets is available at http://www.oecanthinae.com/, which apparently is the product of an amateur tree cricket lover who got bit by the bug (so to speak) fairly hard.

Finally, here’s 7 seconds of video of a male snowy tree cricket singing, courtesy of YouTube user TreeCricketFan, who may be the same hard-bitten obsessive mentioned above, or a different one; I’m not sure:

High Tide

July 23rd, 2009 by John Callender

high_tide_1_linear

Linda was the one who taught me to pay attention to the tide. Low tide is her favorite time to check out the rocks at Tar Pits, or walk the beach to the marsh entrance at Sand Point. If the tide is high, she’s not really interested.

But high tide is a great time to visit the marsh. I took a walk there last weekend, and timed it to coincide with maximum high tide. It was a 6.3; that is, the water’s surface was 6.3 feet above Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). A 6.3 isn’t as high as it gets; at new moon a couple of days later (a couple of days ago, now, as I write this), the tide got up to 7.2.

At 7.2 pretty much all the low marsh habitat, which is dominated by pickleweed (Salicornia virginica), is underwater. Here’s a shot I got last weekend of some pickleweed taking its saltwater bath:

high_tide_salicornia

It’s a neat trick for a plant: being able to live in the open air, while also being able to survive immersed in seawater for hours at a time. The high marsh plants, like saltbush, ragweed, mugwort, and sagebrush, can handle a lot, but immerse them in salt water and they’re history.

Because of the tide, the marsh’s plant communities are vertically stratified, and once you learn to look for it it’s really obvious. Going from lowest to highest, the marsh’s major communities are:

  • Eelgrass beds – Below the lowest of low tides, in the bottoms of the channels that wind through the marsh, is eelgrass. These are strictly aquatic plants.
  • Mud flats – A little higher, in the intertidal zone, are the mud flats. Not much in the way of visible vegetation lives here, but there’s lots of decaying detritus. There are also microorganisms that feed on it, and lots of invertebrates, and aquatic vertebrates (like fish) and terrestrial vertebrates (like shorebirds) that take turns exploiting the flats as the water rises and falls.
  • Low marsh – This is the area where the pickleweed reigns supreme. Most of the time this community is above the waterline, but twice a day the high tide soaks its lower reaches, and twice a month (at the time of new and full moon) the high tide goes all the way to the top, killing any would-be invaders from the high marsh, and maintaining the boundary, as level as if it were layed out by a surveyor, between the two communities.
  • High marsh – A wider assortment of plants, tolerant of the high salt levels in the marsh soil, but incapable of actually being immersed.

There’s something else that happens during the highest tides in the marsh: Aquatic predators (like fish) invade the inundated area, picking terrestrial insects off the pickleweed stems. I’d love to see that.

high_tide_sunset

Mute Swan Siblings?

July 12th, 2009 by John Callender

We’ve been seeing some young mute swans at the salt marsh for a while now. I had read some mentions of a trio of immature mute swans that people were seeing up in Santa Barbara, and it was just a few days later that I saw two of them, also immatures, down in the Carp salt marsh. I assumed they were the same birds, and that the three of them have been hanging around in various combinations ever since.

Lately I’ve been seeing a single mute swan, now in the stunning all-white adult plumage, in either the Franklin Creek or Santa Monica Creek channels at the marsh. Whenever I’m there with William and we see the swan he insists on my snapping a photo with my phone, so I have this to share: a shot of William watching the swan in the Franklin Creek Channel last weekend:

wm_swan2

This past Friday I was visiting UCSB as part of the incoming-freshmen-and-parents orientation (because Julia will be starting there in the fall), and as we were walking around near the dorms (which I note are in a more beautiful setting than anywhere I’ve ever lived), we spotted two mute swans in the campus lagoon. Here’s the (slightly fuzzy) shot I took:

ucsb_swans

I wonder if these are the other two of that original trio of siblings.

Valley Carpenter Bee (Xylocopa varipuncta)

June 18th, 2009 by John Callender

bee11

(Wikipedia image by Matthew Field.)

I’ve noticed this bee several times over the past few years: gigantic (bumblebee-sized or bigger), a beautiful golden color all over, with a habit of hovering for minutes at a time, pausing a few seconds in one place, moving a few feet, hovering again, and repeating, in a circuit that causes it to cruise a limited area over and over. Every time I’ve seen it engaged in this “hover patrol” it has been near some flowers being visited by ordinary honeybees, but I’ve never seen the giant golden bee actually land. I might be reading too much into it, but I get the impression that the bee is aware of me; it seems to face me and check me out, then decides I’m uninteresting and moves on.

I’ve seen this bee in our front yard in Carp, and outside the office building where I work in Santa Monica. (I’ve mentioned my ridiculously long commute, right?) Last Sunday William and I watched one patrolling outside some condos on Sandyland Road, as we walked from the State Beach campground (where we spent the night Sunday night) to the marsh and back.

I asked William what he thought the bee was doing. What’s up with that ceaseless patrol? It has to have a reason, I argued. The bee wouldn’t devote all that energy to the behavior unless there was some point to it.

I’ve tried to google for information about the bee before, without success. Today I tried again, and hit the jackpot.

The bee is the Valley carpenter bee, Xylocopa varipuncta. I’m used to seeing the female patrolling the eaves of houses and other wooden structures, looking for good spots to make a nest hole, and I knew that big black bee was a carpenter bee, but I never realized that this big golden bee was the male of the same species. An article from the UC Davis Department of Entomology quotes entomologist Lynn Kimsey as follows:

Carpenter bees, measuring about an inch long, are the largest bees in California. Their eggs are the largest of all insect eggs. The Valley carpenter bee egg can be 15mm long.

The males are territorial, Kimsey said, and can be quite aggressive. They hover and lie in wait for passing females.

“Female carpenter bees sting, but the males don’t have that apparatus,” Kimsey said. “You can pick up the fuzzy males and they won’t sting you.”

User INaturalist at bugguide.net posted this great image of the bee:

bee2

INaturalist wrote:

These big chubby guys come out in the spring and fly around in the willows where Coyote Creek flows into the percolation ponds. In Sunnyvale I find them in the Baccharis at the WPC ponds. They have a very short flight season — a couple of weeks and they’re gone. The females are black and yellow. This one is a drone — presumably its only function is to mate, so what is it doing patrolling? Waiting for a receptive virgin queen to emerge?

I think INaturalist’s speculation is probably right: The bee is on the lookout for females, and is patrolling a territory he’s staked out that seems likely to attract them.

So: Another mystery solved. :-)

Clarity

June 8th, 2009 by John Callender

I headed to the marsh yesterday with William. My official goal was to examine the terminal bud galls on the coyote brush to see how many of them had emergence holes, and to see if I could find any adult Rhopalomyia californica midges hanging around.

The first thing we noticed at the marsh, though, was this tire near the northern Ash Avenue entrance. My guess is that someone just dumped it there, but maybe there’s more of a story behind it?

marsh_tire

On the midge question, my (very rough) sense of things was that about half of the dozen or so galls I looked at had visible emergence holes. At one point while examining the terminal bud of a coyote brush (a bud that did not have a gall), I saw a small, black, winged insect climbing around, and I wondered if it might be a gall midge. It certainly looked fly-like, and was about the right size, judging by the emergence holes in the galls I’ve looked at. I tried to get a photo, but couldn’t get the focus right, and can’t see the insect in any of the shots I took.

A little more googling for information about the midge turned up an article from the Annals of the Entomological Society of America, titled Portrait of an Ephemeral Adult Stage: Egg Maturation, Oviposition, and Longevity of the Gall Midge Rhopalomyia californica (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Quoting from the abstract:

Observational and experimental studies in the field demonstrate that this midge typically completes its entire lifetime reproduction in a single day: females usually emerge at dawn, mate, and after a posteclosion period of resting, they initiate a sustained period of active oviposition during which most eggs are laid over a 4–5-h period. Mean longevity of adult females is very short, consistently <1 d and only 5–6 h on clear and warm days.

I had no idea the adult midges were so short-lived: The females emerge as adults from the gall with their eggs fully formed, mate, deposit their eggs, and die, all within a single day. I guess that means I have my work cut out for me in terms of finding an adult gall fly.

As often happens when I visit the marsh, the thing I went looking for wasn’t the most interesting thing I found. Instead, my big discovery was how clear the water in the Franklin Creek channel was. You could see all the way to the bottom across the whole width of the channel, and William and I had great views of fish swimming under the footbridge.

Here’s a shot I took that shows five fish swimming in a line from the bottom of the frame toward the top. They were about 18 inches long; I think they might be striped mullet (Mugil cephalus):

fish2

Obviously, when I talk about how clear the water was, I’m talking in relative terms. Normally I can’t see the bottom at all, or see fish that are more than a few inches beneath the surface, so this view qualifies as exceptional in my book.

I also got several shots of what I think was a round stingray (Urolophus halleri). The ray was about the size of a dinner plate:

ray2

Here’s another shot I got just as the ray was swimming into my shadow. Unfortunately, I didn’t include the entire ray in the shot, but this gives a pretty good view of its coloration, including the big, pale spots on its body:

ray1

I’m not sure why the water in the creek was so clear yesterday. We had some light, unseasonal rain last week; maybe that brought some fresh, relatively clear water into the creek channel? In any event, it was really neat to get a good look at what was going on under the surface.